New Jersey Senator formally introduces bill to hike online tax to 30%

Currently, online gambling and sports betting are taxed at 15% and 13% of gross gaming revenue respectively.

Senate Bill 3064 was formally introduced on 8 April, after being filed last week. The bill was referred to the Senate State Government, Wagering, Tourism & Historic Preservation Committee.

If enacted the bill would amend Section 17 of P.L.2013, c.27 (C.5:12-95.19), which specifies the online gambling tax amount. Section 7 of P.L.2018, c.33 (C.5:12A-16), which addresses sports wagering tax, would also be changed.

Should lawmakers approve the proposal, it would take effect on next 1 January that occurs after the date of enactment, per the bill text.

New Jersey gambling tax hike: How does it compare?

A 30% rate would put a significant burden on New Jersey’s 18 mobile sportsbooks, raising taxes to among the highest in the US. New York’s 51% sports betting tax rate is currently the highest in a competitive market, followed by Pennsylvania’s 36% GGR levy.

A number of other states such as Delaware, New Hampshire and Rhode Island tax operators between 51% and 50% of GGR, but all run monopolies through state lotteries.

For internet casino, New Jersey current has one of the lowest tax rates, and 30 igaming sites currently active. A 30% GGR tax would put the state above Connecticut (18% of GGR rising to 20% after five years), Michigan (20%) and West Virginia (15%).

Pennsylvania’s 54% tax on slots remains the highest, though table games are taxed at 16%.

Has Ohio set a precedent for tax raises?

Should New Jersey move ahead with Senator McKeon’s plans, it would follow Ohio in doubling its tax rate.

In July last year Buckeye State Governor Mike DeWine increased the tax rate in his 2024-25 budget, from 10% to 20%.

DeWine’s relationship with the industry soured just days after sports betting launched, namely due to advertising. The state Casino Control Commission has since been quick to crack down on a perceived oversaturation of sportsbook marketing.

New Jersey under the spotlight

New Jersey’s gambling industry has been the subject of much discussion in 2024 so far. In January, Senator Joseph Pennacchio re-introduced a bill to launch racetrack slots and limit advertising. The bill was introduced several times dating back to 2014, and had failed to reach further than committee stage in 2020 and 2022.

Later that month, research from the National Economic Research Associates – commissioned by the Campaign for Fairer Gambling – revealed New Jersey’s igaming market to be “detrimental” for the state’s economy. This is in spite of its positive tax contributions, which the study claims were “cancelled out” by the growing cost of gambling harm.

This contradicts the 2019 study compiled by Dr Alan Meister of Meister Consulting and Gene Johnson of Victor Strategies for iDEA Growth. Internet casino alone generated $401.0m in employee wages and 6,552 full-time jobs between 2013 and 2018.

Over that five-year period, the study says, legal igaming was responsible for $259.3m in tax revenue to state and local governments, including $178.9m in gaming tax.

New Jersey’s gambling revenue reached new heights in 2023, hitting $5.78bn – a new record. For January alone, numbers remained high with $559.1m in revenue, up 28.0% year-on-year.

Solving sports betting – the AI way

Buzz phrases don’t get much buzzier than “AI-assisted”. The mere mention of the phrase either prompts excited optimism about a tech-driven future – or a very real fear of the same.

In the betting and gaming space, the use of artificial intelligence may not quite engender the apocalyptic visions of the AI naysayers in the wider world. But it still appears to offer the possibility of very much changed business practices.

the advent of ai could herald huge change for sports betting, writes Scott Longley

Notably, given the central importance of data to any potential machine learning or AI developments, it is the two leading sports data collection entities that are leading the charge.

The pair launched new AI-assisted sports betting products that appear to point to a new era of sportsbook margin management.

In 2022 Sportradar first launched Alpha Odds, an automated odds recalculation tool. This, the company said, allows its sportsbook clients to generate bespoke betting prices in line with their risk exposure and liabilities.

More recently, the company said the product, which is now in operation with 60 of its clients, delivered an average 10% profit increase in 2023.

Then in January rival Genius Sports announced the launch of its Edge product which similarly promises automated pricing which it says is designed to unlock the maximum amount of profit within every single bet.

The promise of AI

The promise of AI in the context of sportsbooks is reliant on access to data according to Darren Small, SVP for Managed Trading Services (MTS) at Sportradar. And lots of it.

Access to data is crucial in making ai realise its potential in sports betting, says sportradar’s darren small

“AI can do a huge number of things, but it is clear it can only improve the outputs,” he says “There needs to be a feedback loop, otherwise it won’t work. A company needs to have data, the more data the better, to make the most of the AI.  Once a company has the data, then the future opens up.”

But what kind of future? As with wider discussions around developments in AI, the potential for AI is more notional right now even while aspects of machine learning are being deployed across the global network of sportsbooks.

“It is still early days for the industry when it comes to understanding the benefits automation might bring,” says Small. “At present many operators are still at the stage of understanding how automation changes the nature of the trading desk.”

An explosion of events

Even without the enhancements being spoken about by both Sportradar and Genius Sports, and by extension taking place across all sportsbook operations, those working on the sportsbook backends across the industry know how much the nature of the challenge has changed in recent years.

“Just the explosion of events is immense,” says Tom Holland, product director at Genius Sports. “You can’t manage hundreds of thousands of events per year manually.”

Small at Sportradar points out that the company’s managed trading systems sportsbook product itself deploys the technology provided by VAIX. Bought in 2022, VAIX provides AI learning across the 60m-a-day transactions that take place across more than 60 sportsbooks.

“When you have that many transactions taking place on the platform, it is easy to see why we’re adopting machine learning,” Small adds.

AI alchemy

Enter automated odds calculation. The promise of both Alpha Odds and Genius Sports’ Edge product is that with this data to hand, the possibility opens up to use the data to manipulate margins. Such products offer the prospect of managing an entire offering in order to maximise returns.

The prospect of adjusting odds at scale is a huge potential upside of AI-driven solutions

“We can adjust the prices that a client is offering to their customer base to reflect the client’s financial position and their liabilities and subsequently improve the efficiency of their trading,” says Small.

“The system within Alpha allows operators to take a number of different strategic directions – they can choose how they offer their odds to their customer and how they service their end customer.”

The system is doing what we might have done manually 15 years ago with one trader and one match making a decision based on the data available, only doing it at scale. 

“So, we have the system in place, the machine if you like, and overseeing that is our liability trading team who make sure the system is configured in the most efficient and appropriate way per customer,” Small says. “It’s a bespoke solution.”

The system will “understand the tendencies” of each individual client and understand where they may want to “potentially get a little bit more aggressive or a little bit more conservative. And we will configure those odds in a way to get the most out of these models on an individual client level.”

Smooth operators

Clyde Harris, partner at betting and gaming product development house Circle Squared, says it stands to reason that such systems will “smooth out volatility” depending on what strategy the sportsbook in question so desires.

This is what both such AI-assisted systems promise – the possibility of not being hit by the “low lows” in terms of margin while also still hoping to benefit from the higher margin returns.

Tom Daniel, partner at sportsbook operations consultancy Propus Partners, says it is advances such as this which has relatively recently birthed a number of “small quant shops” as he describes them, to rationalise that over time it might be possible to “solve sports betting”.

“The people working on these type of things will be making incremental improvement,” says Daniel. “But the grand aim of ‘solving’ sports betting in the way that some high-frequency traders think they have solved the financial markets is a way off yet.”

What happens next?

Small agrees. “This is a starting point for using AI,” he says. “What Alpha represents is a further mechanisation, if you like, of the sportsbook backend.

“This process was started many years ago with the introduction of algorithms,” he adds. “That was the first step and what we are doing with Alpha Odds is a logical move on from that. It is about building blocks.”

It is a process which is ongoing. “It’s entirely possible that we will reach a point where pricing is done by machine-learning algorithms, customer management is done by automated liability management systems and bet acceptance is done by a combination of both,” says Simon Trim, a consultant currently working on sportsbook strategy and operations with backend provider 10Star.

“Automation reduces the manual work on trading desks and will continue to do so, particularly in risk management and customer segmentation, while still maintaining the subjective input from trading desks,” says Holland from Genius Sports.

New content types

Does increased automation free traders up to develop new content types, as Genius sports’ tom Holland suggests?

What might AI do next? “Once you automate certain processes, then you free up traders to think about new content types rather than simply trying to optimise what they already have,” adds Holland.

“What we have developed and offer to market in terms of machine learning and the automation of sportsbook processes is itself a leap forward. But what comes next will be really interesting, because the more data the system ingests, the better the outputs,” he argues.

Where that leads the sports betting industry will no doubt be as interesting as what happens in the wider world with AI. “With the volume of data available to us, I can see greater use of the technology to improve operational efficiencies right across the board. AI will touch every aspect of an operators business – that where I think we’re heading”, says Small. 

“The future will be very exciting when it comes to what sportsbooks will be able to achieve and the products they will be able to offer in the near future.” 

Inspired allays fears over Nasdaq compliance warning

The provider is yet to make public its Form 10-K for the year ended 31 December 2023. This, Nasdaq says, is in breach of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) and as such has issued a warning to Inspired.

The notification, however, has no immediate effect on the listing of Inspired common stock on Nasdaq. Inspired has 60 calendar days, or until 3 June, to file the form or submit a plan to regain compliance.

Should Inspired submit a plan, Nasdaq can grant an exception of 180 calendar days from the filing’s due date. This would allow Inspired up until 11 September to regain compliance.

However, if Inspired fails to regain compliance in a timely manner, its common stock will be subject to delisting from Nasdaq.

Inspired commits to 15 April publication date

In response, Inspired said that it intends to file the Form 10-K by no later than 15 April. The provider also plans to host a call on this date to discuss the results and its general business trends. 

This filing will be some way past the initial time that Inspired was expected to report its Q4 figures.

Last month, Inspired offered insight into what investors can expect from its Q4 results. The company is set to report revenue and adjusted EBITDA in line with guidance for Q4.

The delayed filing is the result of a broad review of accounting policies, with this taking place during Q4. Inspired said it devoted “considerable” resources to this review.

Issues flagged in the review related to errors in financial statements for periods commencing 1 January 2021. As such, it said these statements can no longer be relied upon and should be restated.

Based on these findings, Inspired said one or more additional “material weaknesses” existed in internal control over financial reporting. This led to it committing to implement changes to remediate such weaknesses including restating financial statements for the periods of concern.

Another warning for Inspired

Incidentally, the latest contact from Nasdaq follows a similar warning over a delay to the provider’s  Q3 results

Nasdaq contacted Inspired in mid-Q4, warning the late filing placed it in breach of its rules. The stock exchange gave Inspired until 22 January to submit a plan to regain compliance, or risk having shares delisted. 

Inspired submitted its plan in January, with this later accepted by Nasdaq. As such, Inspired avoided any further action over the matter.

What happened in Q3?

The delayed Q3 results showed a somewhat mixed performance by Inspired during the three months to 30 September 2023. Revenue climbed 30.9% to $97.5m (£76.9m/€89.9m). 

However, higher spending meant Inspired ended Q3 with a lower net profit of $7.2m, down 58.6%. In addition, adjusted EBITDA slipped 2.2% to $26.7m.

As for the year to date, revenue in the nine months through to 30 September grew 18.0% to $241.8m. 

However, spending was higher in almost all areas in the nine-month period. This meant net loss for the period reached $1.0m, compared to a $20.4m profit in the previous year. Adjusted EBITDA also crept up 1.1% to $74.0m.

Howe: California sports betting will be done “with and through” state tribes

Howe was joined onstage by CNIGA chairman James Siva as well as Jacob Mejia, director of public affairs for Pechanga Development Corporation, both of whom lauded the CEO for being willing to engage in such discussion after the two sides’ previous vitriol. 

FanDuel, DraftKings and other commercial operators burned hundreds of millions in 2022 by lobbying for and promoting Proposition 27, an initiative that would have legalised online sports betting in California but was soundly rejected by state voters.  

Tribes did offer their own initiative – Proposition 26 – that was also rejected by voters, however tribal leaders have maintained that the overall goal was to oppose and defeat Proposition 27 rather than promote and pass Proposition 26.

Now, as Mejia noted on Tuesday, 2026 is the earliest that sports betting could come to the Golden State, which gives both sides time to mend fences and formulate a united approach. 

Offering perspectives

Tribal sovereignty and exclusivity in California were key themes of the 30-minute discussion, with Howe giving her personal definitions for each. 

She posited that sovereignty is “the inherent authority for tribes to govern themselves” and was candid in admitting that the company’s previous attempts to legalise betting in the state without tribal support were “well-intended but misguided and ill-informed”.

In a light-hearted and contrite moment, she held up the notebook of Frank Sizemore, the former vice-president of strategic operations for the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians who was hired by FanDuel in January, which featured a big “NO ON 27” sticker on the cover. 

In addition to Sizemore, the company has also hired former San Manuel COO Rikki Tanenbaum as well as Sequoyah Simermeyer, who resigned as chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission in late February, to help understand the nuances of the tribal industry. 

Siva was resolute throughout the entirety of the discussion that “tribes will remain the sole operators in California”, noting that CNIGA discussions around sports betting started as early as 2019. 

He did concede, however, that expansion is inevitable – it’s just a matter of forming a unified front to get to that point. 

“We have the destination, now we’re just carving the path,” Siva said. 

Future plans contingent on tribes’ consent 

When asked about the future, Howe agreed that no future ballot measure will succeed without broad tribal consensus, citing recent polling data that indicates voter sentiment has not changed much since the 2022 vote. 

California, she said, will be different from any other of the 20-plus jurisdictions FanDuel operates in, given the massive revenue potential as well as the unique tribal influence. 

Howe also talked about the fact that tribes are already losing potential revenue because of black market sites that have operated in the market for years, if not decades. 

To finish the discussion, Siva offered a blunt message to FanDuel and all other commercial bookmakers: “Get out of our way – we know what we are doing, be patient and listen to the tribes. ” 

Colorado sports betting revenue down despite handle increase in February

Revenue was down year-on-year from $35.4m in February 2023. Colorado’s monthly total was also 51.8% less than the $53.5m posted in January of this year.

Online betting generated $25.9m in gross gaming revenue in February. However, a $144,982 loss from retail betting pushed the monthly total down slightly.

This decline came despite handle in Colorado climbing 8.6% from $494.4m in February last year to $537.0m. However, this figure was 10.0% behind the $596.7m bet during January.

Online wagers for the month amounted to $533.5m, while a further $3.5m was bet at retail sportsbooks across the state.

Basketball the sport of choice for Colorado bettors

Breaking down the market sport by sport, basketball proved the most popular with Colorado players in February. Some $229.8m was bet on basketball during the month, accounting for some 42.8% of all bets placed.

Tennis wagers reached $47.0m and ice hockey $33.0m. However, despite the NFL hosting its end-of-season showpiece Super Bowl in February, American football bets only hit $29.4m.

Other stand-out sports in February included college basketball, which drew $25.2m in bets, football at $24.7m and table tennis $12.6m. It was also noted that parlay bets during the month topped $105.3m.

Consumers won a total of $511.2m from betting on sports in Colorado, including $507.6m online. 

As for tax, Colorado generated $1.3m in sports betting tax in February. Almost all of this came from online betting, with retail wagering resulting in just $2,509 in tax.

Detroit casino revenue edges up to $123.9m in March

Revenue in March was clear of the $119.2m posted in the same month last year. March’s total was also 18.5% ahead of the $104.6m recorded in Detroit in February this year.

Some $122.3m of this amount came from slots and table games, up 3.8% year-on-year and 16.7% higher than February. 

In comparison, retail sports betting qualified adjusted gross receipts (QAGR) reached just $1.6m. However, this total was 13.2% ahead of last year and a stark improvement on the $120,142 loss reported in February.

MGM continues to lead the Detroit market

MGM Grand Detroit remains some way out in front in terms of market share in Detroit. The casino reported a 46.0% market share in March.

MGM posted $56.7m in table games and slots revenue, up 4.1%, while sports betting QAGR reached $327,857.

MotorCity Detroit placed second with a 31.0% share of the market. Revenue from slots and table games was 7.2% higher at $38.4m, with sports betting QAGR hitting $538,988.

Hollywood Casino at Greektown rounded off the trio of operators with a market share of 23.0% in March. Slots and table games revenue slipped 1.4% to $27.3m, but it led the way in terms of sports betting QAGR, with this reaching $731,389.

As for tax, the three casinos paid $9.9m in gaming taxes to the State of Michigan. This was in addition to $14.5m in wagering taxes and development agreement payments made to the City of Detroit.

For sports betting, some $60,413 was paid in gaming taxes to the state. A further $73,838 was submitted in wagering taxes to the City of Detroit based on retail sports betting revenue.

Operator-branded platforms won’t have a home in legal California wagering

But don’t expect platforms like BetMGM, Caesars Sportsbook, DraftKings, ESPN BET, Fanatics Sportsbook or FanDuel to have operator-branded platforms in the state.

“I can tell you what they won’t be,” California Nations Indian Gaming Association (CNIGA) chairman James Siva said. “They won’t be operators in the state. If they want to be partners like the slot companies we work with, then we can do that. I think they are starting to come around.

“And I think urgency is the right word… but right now, while it’s urgent, we won’t be hurried and we will make decisions based on real data. We are going to make sure we stay united in purpose. Keep that urgency in the back of your mind, because we need to do it, but we need to do it right.”

FanDuel apology tour continues

Earlier in the day, FanDuel CEO Amy Howe continued the company’s mea culpa tour, telling Indian Country that the company made a mistake in trying to run a ballot initiative to legalise online sports betting in California in 2022.

The apology tour started in February, when company president Christian Genetski told tribal leaders at the Western Indian Gaming Conference that the effort “was definitely a spectacular failure on our part. It wasn’t the right plan or the right time.”

At the time, he used the words “uninformed” and “misguided”, which Howe echoed Tuesday.

fanduel ceo amy howe told the audience at the Indian gaming association Tradeshow & convention that her company must defer to the tribes in california in the future.

No matter how operators respond going forward, it appears that California’s Indian Country is more unified and prepared to act as one in the quest to legalise.

Although no one on the dais would commit to a timeline, the first available opportunity for an initiative is 2026 and, given concerns raised by Daniel Salgado, a CNIGA executive board member and chairman of the Cahuilla Band of Indians, tribes will aim to move sooner than later.

“We are united in purpose, we want to help the (Revenue Sharing Trust Fund) tribes,” Salgado said. “So how long should those tribes continue to live in poverty? Do you feel that urgency to help the RSTF tribes?

“If you do, we will move forward. I feel the understanding, the urgency, but I tell my tribe that we won’t get it until we are ready for it. I feel the pressure because I see those third-world situations, no water, no electricity, no gas and that is on our reservations.”

“No tribes left behind”

Of California‘s 100+ tribes, 72 are part of the RSTF and receive $1.1m per year from the gaming-tribes’ fund.

When it was established more than 20 years ago, the concept and fund itself were considered cutting edge. Now, Salgado and other leaders seek an increase in funding but, potentially more importantly, it appears the plight of the RSTF tribes will play a key role in determining what legal wagering California ultimately looks like.

Siva and Salgado repeatedly used the phrase “no tribes left behind”. San Manuel Band of Mission Indians vice chairman Johnny Hernandez said: “We have to benefit all tribes and we have to have unity. If you divide tribes, we’re all doomed to fail.”

CNIGA chairman james siva (right) wouldn’t reveal a timeline for a california ballot initiative but said operator-branded platforms are unlikely.

Hernandez’s tribe was behind a digital sports betting initiative that ultimately did not make the 2022 ballot, but could serve as a guide for the next go-round.

“With Prop. 26, we thought things were flawed and it didn’t go far enough. So we wanted to be in the drivers seat,” Hernandez said of Prop. 26. “How do you get a model in there for the RSTF tribes to be comfortable? So, we had a model in there to provide funds for RSTF tribes. Not only does sports betting have to be for everyone, but it has to support everyone and it’s just the start before igaming.”

Tuck in, because the wait continues

So, when will the tribes move on legal sports betting?

Everyone is “going to have to continue to wait”, Siva said. “When we have our timeline, we’ll let you know. Tribes are the operators for gaming in California, period.

“When that happens, we will decide what the path forward is. And if we decide to partner with a group like FanDuel or DraftKings, then we will let them know what our terms are and they can decide if they want to move forward.”

“Back in the game: Indian Gaming Association conference chair @VictorRocha1
told Compliance+More that retail sports betting will be back on the ballot in California in 2026, with mobile to follow in 2028 if all goes to plan.“

— Brianne Doura Schawohl (@BrianneDoura) April 2, 2024

One company, one tribe: Supporting Alea’s workforce one health benefit at a time

Alex Tomic, founder of Alea, believes that ultimately great companies stem from a healthy workforce. When Covid-19 happened, Alea brought in an Oxyhelp hyperbaric chamber for employees struggling with the illness. Now, Alea has launched a wellness and health programme, providing employees with Whoop bands and Oura rings to track mental and physical wellbeing. Tomic believes that through these health benefits, the impact on cognitive and emotional functions is propelling the Alea team to be at the forefront of a healthy – and happy – workforce.

MGM Resorts raises $750m via senior notes

The offering, totalling $750m, was issued at par and at a rate of 6.500%, due in 2032. MGM Resorts (MGM) intends to use the net proceeds from the offering of the notes to “repay existing indebtedness, including its outstanding 6.750% senior notes due 2025”.

As per its announcement, the company also “may invest the net proceeds in short-term interest-bearing accounts, securities or similar investments”.

A senior note is a form of a bond that will take precedence over other debts in the event of bankruptcy. As they carry a lower degree of risk, senior notes pay lower rates of interest than other bonds.

The notes being offered will be general unsecured senior obligations of MGM. This means that in the event of liquidation, the holders of the unsecured senior notes may not recoup their principal and interest in full.

How does the market rate MGM Resorts’ senior notes?

Fitch Ratings is one of the “big three” credit rating agencies alongside Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s.

In analysing MGM’s bonds, Fitch assigns a ‘BB-‘/’RR4’ rating to MGM’s senior unsecured notes. This gives the company a “stable” outlook.

According to Fitch, the rating reflects MGM’s mid-5x EBITDAR leverage. In the agency’s view, it is commensurate with MGM’s “conservative financial policy”.

Fitch also highlights MGM’s “robust liquidity position”. This accounts for MGM’s “scale, strong competitive position and diversification in its Las Vegas and regional markets”.

China and Las Vegas success drives growth in 2023

MGM Resorts posted a year-on-year increase in revenue for its 2023 financial year. This followed record performances by its business in both China and Las Vegas.

During what was another busy year for MGM, group revenue in 2023 amounted to $16.20bn (£12.85bn/€15.12bn). This was 23.7% ahead of the previous year amid growth across two key markets.

Las Vegas remains the primary source of revenue for MGM, with revenue here rising 4.8% year-on-year. This was helped by the acquisition of The Cosmopolitan in May 2022 and the impact of major events in the city. This included the inaugural Formula One race in November 2023.

However, MGM China reported the most growth during 2023. MGM put this down to the removal of all Covid-19 pandemic restrictions, with these having impacted its performance in 2022.

MGM noted some decline in its Regional Operations business, but this was more than offset by growth in the “management and other operations” segment. This includes BetMGM, the joint venture with Entain, which hit full-year targets and expanded outside the US by going live in the UK.

In total, MGM’s full-year adjusted EBITDAR at MGM amounted to $4.59bn. This also saw operating profit rise 31.4% to $1.89bn.

Future plans for MGM Resorts in New York and Osaka

A major part of MGM’s 2024 plans will see expansion into New York in the US and Osaka in Japan.

In November, MGM unveiled its vision to transform its Empire City Casino in New York into a full-scale commercial casino. Other planned amenities include a BetMGM Sportsbook and Lounge betting facility, restaurants and an entertainment venue.

However, the project hinges on MGM securing one of the three full commercial casino licences currently available in New York. The timeline for these licences will be announced in the coming months, with the bidding process having launched earlier this year

The request for proposal process is under way, with MGM CEO Bill Hornbuckle hoping for approval before the end of the year.

“We anticipate submitting our full application to the government by the middle of this year with a decision expected shortly thereafter,” Hornbuckle said. “We’re hopeful that, by the end of 2024, something is awarded. But we don’t know any more, unfortunately.”

Meanwhile, certification for building an integrated casino resort in Osaka was finalised in late September. MGM is working with Orix Corporation, with Japan’s ministry of land, infrastructure, transport and tourism having already approved the project. Hornbuckle said MGM is on track to commence early construction efforts in 2025, with the aim of opening in 2030. 

Record handle fails to halt Maine sports betting revenue decline in March

Monthly handle in March was 40.8% higher than the $33.8m spent in February. It was also the highest total since Maine opened its legal market in November last year.

However, adjusted gross receipts from sports wagering totalled $2.7m, down 41.9% from $4.3m in February. Incidentally, this was also the lowest monthly amount since Maine launched regulated betting.

Adjusted gross receipts is the remaining total after subtracting voided and cancelled bets, player winnings and federal excise tax from handle. Maine’s current record for this figure is $4.6m, set in November.

Tax revenue for the state in March amounted to $270,607. Players in Maine won a total of $44.6m.

DraftKings the clear leader in Maine

Maine currently has just two licensed sports wagering operators – DraftKings and Caesars. Both offer sports betting in the state via tribal partnerships.

DraftKings, partnered with the Passamaquoddy tribe, posted $2.5m worth of adjusted gross receipts in March. Consumers wagered some $39.0m through the partnership.

Player winnings for the month reached $36.3m, with federal excise tax payments hitting $95,303 and other tax $253,643.

As for Caesars, the group works with three of the Wabanaki nations: the Houlton band of Maliseet Indians, Mi’kmaq nation and Penobscot nation.

During March, Caesars reported some $169,639 in adjusted gross receipts from $8.6m in total bets.

Players won $8.3m from betting with Caesars in March. Federal excise tax amounted to $21,137 and other tax $16,964.