ATG warns over impact of “global economic challenges”

Total revenue for the nine months through to the end of September amounted to SEK3.9bn (£305.9m/€352.6m/$346.9m), a decrease of less than 1% on the same period last year.

ATG said that while the effects of the pandemic had continued to die down during the nine months, the business now faces wider challenges in the impact of the war in Ukraine and also global economic issues due to high inflation and the potential for an impending recession.  

Chief financial officer Lotta Nilsson Viitala said it was difficult to estimate how much both of these factors would hit ATG, but admitted that the business would be impacted.

“We see tendencies towards our customers having less money left in the entertainment wallet,” Viitala said. “It is completely natural with the price increases and interest rate increases that are taking place.

“The economic situation affects all people and with less money left for entertainment and consumption of games, it will also affect ATG. However, it is difficult to say how much already.”

Looking more closely at ATG’s performance in the first three quarters, horse racing betting remained by far the largest source of income for ATG, with revenue reaching SEK3.02bn. This was 6% lower than last year, though ATG said this was to be expected due to the sharp increase it experienced during the pandemic.

Sports betting revenue was 6% higher at SEK479m, with ATG saying it remained the largest sports wagering operator in Sweden during the period. 

In addition, casino revenue hiked 52% year-on-year to SEK384m following an increase in customer numbers after the removal of temporary, pandemic-related restrictions.

However, it was also noted that group costs, including tax, were 5% higher at SEK3.2bn as a result of higher revenue across sports betting and casino. As such, operating profit slipped 13% year-on-year to SEK1.2bn.

Earlier this month, ATG CEO Hasse Lord Skarplöth slammed the widespread use of bonuses by gambling operators. He said that the use of promotions is “embarrassing” and that they “drive gambling addiction”

Arizona sports betting handle reaches $361.0m in August

Sports wagering handle was ahead of $290.5m in July and also represented the second consecutive month of growth in the state. Some $359.2m was wagered online, with just $1.5m spent at retail sportsbooks.

Players won $323.8m from sports betting in August, leaving $36.3m in revenue for the month, up 65.0% from $22.0m in July.

After accounting for $8.5m in free bets and promotional credits, taxable revenue for the month was $27.8m, an increase of 85.3% from $27.8m in the previous month.

DraftKings led the market in terms of handle, processing $129.8m in bets, all of which were placed online. FanDuel was second with $109.7m in total bets, split $108.7m online and $1.0m at retail locations, then BetMGM on $58.2m in online wagers.

Turning to gross revenue and FanDuel narrowly claimed top spot with $11.7m. DraftKings was second with $11.2m, then BetMGM on $7.2m.

Corvex looks to appoint partner to Kindred board in pursuit of sale

Corvex acquired a 10% stake in Kindred earlier this year, and immediately announced that it would push for the operator’s board to pursue a sale.

The Kindred board did so, but was unable to find a buyer at an appropriate price. iGB understands that questions about how Kindred had adapted to the increasing prevalence of locally regulated markets became an obstacle for some prospective buyers.

Corvex then increased its stake to become Kindred’s top shareholder. Upon announcing this, it requested the opportunity to have a role on Kindred’s nomination committee, allowing it to select board members.

Corvex founder Keith Meister was named as chairman of the nomination committee, giving him significant influence in board appointments.

Now, the Meister-led committee has chosen Corvex partner James Gemmel to sit on the board. Kindred shareholders will vote on Gemmel’s appointment at an extraordinary general meeting on 14 November.

Earlier this year, sources with an understanding of the Kindred sale process suggested that – should the operator fail to find a buyer – Corvex could push to have Henrik Tjärnström removed as CEO in order to introduce new management that could make the business more sale-friendly. However, it remains to be seen whether Gemmel will aim to do this.

Gemmel has previously worked with the boards of directors of Exelon Corporation, Occidental Petroleum, and The Williams Companies.  Before joining Corvex, he worked as an investment analyst at Federated Hermes Inc. and as an investment analyst for the Prudent Bear Fund of David W. Tice & Associates.

Single customer view: is it the answer?

In the two years since the announcement of the Gambling Act review, the industry has followed breadcrumbs that claim to hint at what the review might address.

Chief among those might be affordability measures and harder checks on those losing £2,000 per month, while marketing reforms have also played a role.

But looking only at the expected topics covered in the review might mean missing a big one. The single customer view – a passion project of the Gambling Commission and BGC members rather than something being pursued mainly by government – might just be the biggest game-changer among upcoming reforms.

If implemented, it will allow operators to see the full picture of a players’ activities across multiple different accounts, giving them the power to intervene and stop a cycle of harmful gambling.

Until Prime Minister Liz Truss resigned yesterday, the Gambling Act Review and single customer view shared similar timelines, despite the work being done coming from different sources. But now that the review seems certain to once again be delayed, the single customer view might get a head start.

In a sense, the resignation has paved the way for the Commission and the Information Commissioner’s Office – in charge of data protection issues – to give the single customer view more prominence as a measure of its own, rather than part of a large package of reforms. It now has space to be delivered in a more timely manner, one that could potentially pre-empt the review’s publication. And that makes it more important than ever.

Propelling forward

The most recent update to the single customer view saga came earlier this week, when Commission chief executive Andrew Rhodes said that a trial would take place “in the coming months” – the most concrete update on timelines for a national scheme we’ve had to date.

The Commission has long spoken about the fact that it does not want to use the review as an excuse not to act and raise standards where it believes they need to be raised. Yet in certain areas, it has let the government take charge.

The regulator let the government take the lead on affordability measures, long ago scrapping the initial plans to introduce them unilaterally as proposed in a customer interaction consultation. That ensured there would be greater public accountability, but on the government’s timeline, which we have since discovered can be frequently disrupted.

But in prioritising the single customer review, the Commission has made it clear that this is something worth pursuing. This is a telling perspective and it’s the right one.

Buckling down

In the context of recent governmental turmoil, getting the single customer view in place is more important than ever. From a purely player protection standpoint, it can clearly make a huge difference, especially given the impact of the cost-of-living crisis on people’s finances.

But practically for the industry, getting the single customer view in place quickly but effectively could also be significant. If the Commission and the ICO work on ensuring an effective implementation, it could make the enactment of more stringent affordability measures smoother – creating an environment where it would be easier to address only those at risk of harm without needlessly affecting the wider customer base.

And if the industry and Gambling Commission – both regularly maligned by campaigners – can bring in a genuinely workable solution to reduce harm while the government continues to bicker, it would surely show that industry solutions can be trusted, and the public should be more sceptical of government. Given that we are unaware of when the review will take place, a pre-emptive strike on problem gambling could be key.

While the single customer view shouldn’t be regarded as the be-all-and-end-all solution for problem gambling, its significance is clear. If there’s something concrete to point to in this area when the review enters its fnal stages, it could make a world of difference.

Belgium’s €200 loss limit comes into force

The lower limit was announced in July by a royal decree, having been put forward by Minister of Justice Vincent Van Quickenborne.

Previously, net deposits were limited to €500 per week, after an April 2020 decree.

The limit will continue to apply on a per-site basis, after attempts to introduce a “global” limit – to apply across all operators – fell through.

Players may request to have their limit raised, but only if they are not registered as defaulters with the Central Individual Credit Register of the National Bank.

“It is always possible for players to request a lower personal limit from the operators,” the Belgian Gaming Commission said. “To keep gambling fun, it is recommended to spend no more than 5% of income on gambling.”

Belgium is also hoping to implement a complete ban on all non-lottery gambling ads, a measure that has been the source of a great deal of controversy.

Initial 29 applicants register interest in Massachusetts sports betting licences

The state’s regulator on October 7 released a scoping survey, a required prerequisite of a sports wagering operator application in Massachusetts. Parties interested in applying were required to submit the survey by October 17 so that the MGC could begin reviewing those that plan to apply.

The MGC said that it received 29 operators scoping surveys from potential applicants for Category 1, 2 and 3 Sports Wagering Licences by the deadline. Three were in relation to Category 1 Licences, three from parties interested in Category 2 Licences, and 23 came from potential Category 3 Licence applicants.

Read the full story on iGB North America.

Nominations open for iGB Affiliate Awards

Those in the affiliate space will have until 31 October to try to get their names on the ballot for the prestigious event, which will include black-tie awards ceremony comprising a three-course sit-down dinner and an after party. The theme for the event will be “Made in NYC”.

The 2023 celebration of igaming and the contributions made by the affiliate community includes 21 categories, with 20 of these free to the industry to enter or vote on.

Nominations will take place for the Best Affiliate Employer; Best Affiliate Manager; Best Affiliate Network; Best Affiliate Programme; Best Bingo Affiliate; Best Casino Affiliate;Best Poker Affiliate, Best Crypto Affiliate; Best Sports Betting Affiliate; Best Affiliate Tech; Best Programme Tech; Best Digital Agency; Game of the Year; Best Innovation; Best Marketing Campaign; Best Newcomer; Rising Star; Best Use of Social Media; Best Safer Gambling Initiative and ESG Trailblazer. 

The Affiliate Idol (a lifetime achievement award) will be selected by an in-house panel.

Looking ahead to the Awards, Naomi Barton, portfolio director responsible for iGB Affiliate London, said: “The awards evening is recognised as being one of the key social and networking events in the igaming affiliate calendar, and serves as a celebration of everything that’s positive about the sector and the people who make it so special.

“The categories cover all aspects of the business including innovation, creativity, integrity and talent. I am hugely grateful to our illustrious judging panel for their valuable time as we come together and celebrate this truly awesome and vibrant industry.

“We feel this is the strongest lineup assembled to date, including rising stars such as Laura da Silva Gomes judging the Safer Gambling and ESG Trailblazer categories, and Cristina Turbatu applying her expertise to the tech and innovation areas, alongside legendary pioneers such as Simon Collins.”

You can cast your nominations for the awards here

A natural evolution for player props

Two rising forces in sports betting lately have been – in terms of purely trading and markets – an effort to include more player proposition bets and – from a more user-experience-led perspective – a greater effort to integrate insights into the product.

So it only makes sense that these two products would converge.

Henry Newman, CEO, Sporting Risk

Still, it may be surprising to see who has brought a product combining player prop trading and facts for consumers to market first. It wasn’t from one of the data giants or a widely known sportsbook provider, though it was from a group that has made its living from bookmakers for some time.

Henry Newman, chief executive of Sporting Risk, notes that his company’s history in running a successful betting syndicate played a role in helping to deliver the supplier’s Prop Futures product.

“The way that our data is collected is that every action that could possibly be recorded as an ID,” he says. “So all of our models are based on the lowest common denominator in a game of football which is any action from an individual player. 

“That’s been a driving part of what’s driven the pricing for a syndicate for a number of years, it’s always been there and now it’s got the opportunity to flourish on the B2B level.”

Pricing and facts

The Prop Futures product is one that combines pricing for player proposition bets with insights for the bettor.

“Essentially, Prop Futures is the first product in the market that combines pricing for player proposition markets and key proposition facts, so that both pricing and facts are brought to the forefront of the player’s experience,” Newman says.

The pitch for the product, Newman says, revolves around integration.

“One of the biggest difficulties that operators find is their roadmaps for integration whether of existing products or new products. So when you can provide a solution with the most seamless integration, that’s going to get to market quicker than one with multiple integrations.

“So if the trading is separate from the fact provision, there might be multiple APIs to connect to, that requires crossover and synchronisation of IDs for teams, markets and players and mapping for that. In addition, what you can also find is that you might be integrating into an iframe and then you’ve got to integrate facts into that iframe.

“And as people in the industry know, any time there’s two providers there’s usually two contracts, so it takes longer with the legal department and all of that.”

Competing on depth

But while a single product is obviously smoother to implement than a separate player props tool and insights on top of an existing sportsbook, what about competing with products from suppliers that already provide the core aspects of the sportsbook?

Here, Newman says the focus has been on providing a deep range of markets, that generalist sportsbook providers may have difficulty keeping up with.

“Our key USP is not just the fact we’re offering the pricing alongside the facts,” he says. “Another key factor is the breadth and depth of our coverage. We’ve got coverage for over 100 leagues. Every single game that we provide coverage for, if a player is on the pitch, he will have a price in every single market that we offer, and we offer 20+ markets. 

“So regardless of if you’re offering the Premier League, Bunderliga. 2 or J-League in Japan, you’re getting the same user experience, and that is definitely not in the market at the moment. And we have the depth of data and the granularity of data that allows us to do that.”

That does present a challenge though. While certain aspects of the product are automated, there’s still significant manual functions. And the more markets that are offered, the more work that is for the people providing those manual functions.

“The scale of the markets has risen, not quite exponentially but a significant amount,” Newman says. “Being able to handle the pricing was certainly a challenge. We’ve spent a lot of time leveraging our ability in the predictive space to ensure that our pricing is accurate.”

World Cup approaching

It’s hard to miss that the launch of the product comes soon before the 2022 Fifa World Cup. International football can often be a different beast to the club game, and tournaments especially so. With this in mind, Newman says that he believes Prop Futures may have a chance to shine at the event given the difficulty of gaining reliable data on the topic.

“What you often find with international tournaments is the lack of data that’s available,” he says. “So if you can extend your coverage and by accompanying that with the proposition facts, that will drastically increase the data that is available to the consumer.” 

So preparing for the event is obviously the next major goal for Sporting Risk. But further on the horizon, Newman says he hopes to see the product expanded further into more sports, highlighting US sports – where prop bets have been especially popular – and esports in particular.

“We’re already doing expensive work on the modeling for both US sports and esports. But we’re also hoping to be creative within our market creation. We’ve got the flexibility to launch new products within the proposition field that we hope will be interesting and make punters more engaged.”

Gibraltar defers FATF reporting as AML body calls for tougher fines

The British overseas territory was added to the list following the June FATF plenary, the same meeting in which Malta was removed from the list. At the time, the body noted that the gambling sector was a major reason for Gibraltar’s presence on the list, and said that authorities were not “applying sufficient fines for anti-money laundering failings”.

Despite this, Gibraltar gambling commissioner Andrew Lyman said the jurisdiction would not issue more sanctions simply because of the FATF grey listing.

Upon being added to the list, the territory agreed an action plan to improve its anti-money laundering measures. This mostly dealt with ensuring that non-bank financial bodies used a range of effective sanctions for AML failings.

Now, the FATF has issued the latest edition of its list, including new additions to the list, removals and updates on how countries that had already been listed had made progress with their action plans.

However, for Gibraltar, there was no progress provided, as the jurisdiction opted to defer its reporting to the body, in order to fully focus on providing more complete progress at a later date.

FATF president T. Raja Kumar continued to focus on AML penalties as an area where Gibraltar must improve.

“Gibraltar needs to increase the dissuasiveness of its penalties, in particular fines related to the gambling industry and the legal sector that serves these companies,” he said.

“Gibraltar is a small jurisdiction, but it is an offshore financial hub, and the home to many gambling companies.”

Gibraltar was not likely to be removed from the FATF grey list at the October meeting, as this process to be reviewed and removed is typically much longer. Malta was removed from the list within a year of being added, which was considered an extremely short turnaround.

Gibraltar gambling reforms

Gibraltar is currently planning an overhaul of its gambling laws.

It launched a consultation on new licence fees this week, following its earlier proposal for a new Gambling Act

The new licence fee structure will now be tier-based, with higher fees for larger businesses but lower fees for small ones.

The Gambling Act, meanwhile, is mostly focused on ensuring that Gibraltar licensees have a genuine local presence.