Bally’s scores new partnership with MLB’s Yankees

Under the deal, four Bally’s brands will become designated as official partners of the team.

The Bally Bet brand will become an official sports betting partner, Monkey Knife Fight an official daily fantasy sports partner, Bally Casino an igaming partner and Bally Play an official free-to-play gaming partner. Bally’s Casino Atlantic City will also serve as a proud partner of the Yankees.

The operator and its four brands will benefit from branding opportunities inside the team’s Yankee Stadium ballpark, including LED advertising positions on the outfield wall, field-facing walls, the Terrace Level ribbon board, and LED boards throughout the Great Hall.

In addition, Bally’s will receive an in-game feature on the ballpark’s centre field video board and other brand-enhancing activations.

The deal marks Bally’s first sports team partnership in New York after its Bally Bet brand last month became the ninth online sports betting operator to go live in the state since it launched its legal market in January of this year.

“This is a great partnership that will give Bally Bet and our other Bally’s Interactive brands terrific visibility in New York,” Bally’s Interactive North America chief operating officer Adi Dhandhania said. “The Yankees’ history as a franchise and their popularity as a global brand speaks for itself.”

Yankees senior vice president of partnerships Michael Tusiani added: “We are excited to begin this partnership with Bally’s. We hope that their branding in Yankee Stadium along with their in-stadium customer engagement will greatly strengthen Bally’s overall gaming presence in New York.”

FanDuel names Renzin as chief legal officer

Renzin will assume her new role while also continuing in her position as chief compliance officer, a role she has served in since January 2021.

Among Renzin’s responsibilities will be overseeing legal, risk, regulatory engagement, compliance and responsible gaming for the group, with a focus on customer safety and security.

Renzin joined FanDuel in October 2019 as vice president for regulatory and compliance, prior to which she spent over six years working in a number of roles for JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Earlier in her career, she spent times as manging director at Guidepost Solutions and almost nine years with law firm Stillman, Friedman & Shechtman, first as an associate and later a partner.

In addition, Renzin had one year as an associate with Simpson Thacher and Bartlett and spent over 12 months as a judicial law clerk on the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

“Carolyn is a passionate, bright, empathetic and extremely hard-working leader and colleague,” FanDuel president Christian Genetski said. “In her time at FanDuel, she has led transformative change for our business in building out a regulatory and compliance function befitting the current and future scale of our company.

“I’m confident she is the right choice to lead our high-performing legal team going forward.”

The appointment comes after FanDuel last month also named Christian Genetski as its new president and Mike Raffensperger as chief commercial officer.

Genetski took on his new role having served as the group’s chief legal officer for the past seven and a half years, prior to which he spent a year as its chief commercial officer.

Raffensperger moved into the position of chief commercial officer after four and a half years as chief marketing officer at FanDuel.

Betsson brand and Tete-a-Tete Casino fined in Lithuania

Gaming Strategy Group was fined €25,000 (£20,982/$25,591) for breaching rules regarding advertising after it distributed a newsletter to 10,430 customers about an online game.

Sent in February this year, the newsletter included information about the game and its features, as well as the option for players to click on links to log in to their account or to request a new password if they had forgotten their login details.

Last year, the Lithuanian government introduced a ban on range of gambling advertising, including promotional bonuses. The law on gambling prohibits the promotion of gambling through activities such as special events, test games, promotions, discounts, gifts and other incentives.

In its ruling, the Gambling Supervisory Authority said that as the newsletter’s intention was to draw attention to a gambling service and specific details about the game, including its win percentage and free spins features, this was in breach of Article 10 (19) of Lithuania’s gambling regulations (ALI).

In the case of Tete-a-Tete Casino, the Gambling Supervisory Authority issued the operator a fine of €15,000 for allowing players located outside Lithuania to gamble through its website remotely.

The regulator said this breached Article 205, Part 3, Article 201, Part 1 of the ALI as gambling with an operator licensed in Lithuania while not physically located in the country is illegal on the part of the gambling operator. 

Tete-a-Tete Casino was also warned that its licence could be suspended if it does not put in place the relevant processes to halt such activity in the future. The operator has until 10 August to comply with the request. 

The Gambling Supervisory Authority noted that neither decision was final, and both of the operators can appeal the rulings.

The latest fines comes after Tete-a-Tete Casino, along with Olympic Casino Group Baltija and UAB Baltic Bet, were in May also fined for breaching marketing rules in Lithuania.

All three operators have previously faced disciplinary action in the country, the most recent being Olympic Casino Group Baltija when in March it was fined €25,000 for publishing information about a poker tournament on its website.

Baltic Bet was fined €12,450 for “organising gambling outside of gambling regulations” in October last year, while Tete-a-Tete Casino in March 2021 became the first operator to be fined under new regulations in Lithuania for unreasonably setting betting limits on an online customer.

A number of other operators have also been fined for breaching advertising laws in recent months, including Top Sport, which was fined €25,000, while 7bet operator Amber Gaming was handed a €6,789 penalty.

Also in May, both Unigames and Betsson were fined after being found in violation of the country’s ban on gambling promotion.

Gaining altitude or experiencing turbulence?

Online gambling regulation in the Netherlands was discussed as far back as 2009 yet only launched in October 2021.

And the operators licensed were different to what the industry had expected. The local incumbents, Nederlandse Loterij (NLO) and Holland Casino, were among them as were international brands such as Bet365 and Tombola.

A host of high-profile names were conspicuous by their absence. The likes of Entain, Betsson, 888 Holdings and Kindred Group pulled out, having passively accepted bets from local consumers.

This led to a “deluge” of players coming to Holland Casino, according to director of digital transformation Jeroen Verkroost.

“We were over the moon but completely understaffed and had to shift from first to fifth gear almost immediately, which came with some teething problems,” Verkroost recalls.

Sam Depoortere, business director for NLO’s Toto sportsbook and casino, admits the private operators having to wait for licences was “a pleasant surprise”.

But it has not curtailed the illegal market entirely. Channelisation, he says, is still affected by illegal operators, especially Curaçao licensees.

“The goal was to have 85% channelisation, and I think it is about 65-70%, which is good, but there’s still a big number of illegal parties that are not being discouraged from targeting the market.”

Phased opening

For Peter-Paul de Goeij, managing director of operator body Nederlandse Online Gambling Associatie (NOGA), these factors led to a “phased” market opening.

“That was of course not the intention; the intention was to punish the operators that had been breaking the prioritisation criteria rules before,” he says. That distorts competition in favour of the first wave.

“Before, it was the expectation that being passively available to Dutch customers during application was admissible,” he says.

“It became clear halfway through September, [from] a bombshell letter sent by the minister at the time, that he would instruct the KSA to enforce the rules more strictly. Because channelisation was possible as a result of the launch, [they could] convince operators to leave the market until they had a licence to operate.

“That was a surprise to the market, I don’t think anybody saw that coming. There have been some effects, and of course the first-to-market operators clearly have benefited from this.”

Verkroost, however, is more forthright, objecting to the idea that these international brands were held back from the market: “All of the brands knew the rules,” he says. “It is not something that happened to them, it’s their transgression. To talk about these companies being ‘forced out’ or ‘kept out’ of the market is unjustified.”

Of course, the likes of Holland Casino and NLO, as established and visible brands in the market, were beneficiaries. BetCity, a local brand since acquired by Entain, is often cited as another.

Based on numbers published by regulator de Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) in its 2021 report, gross gaming revenue for the fourth quarter of 2021 came to €185.5m.

From its launch on 4 October to the end of the year, Holland Casino reported online GGR of €40.4m, giving it a 21.8% market share. NLO, through Toto, generated €64.6m over the same period, a 34.8% share.

Last-minute dash

Toto has been in the market since 1957 and even had an online presence prior to launch as a monopoly operator. But Depoortere points out it lacked a full product offering, with no in-play betting or casino.

“We grew during that time but we were fighting with one hand behind our back, as we advertise but we couldn’t offer the best player experience,” he says. “Was there a benefit to being the only legal provider in the market? I’m not sure there was much of a benefit – for the brand building, yes, but in terms of the offering, no.”

Its market share two years ago was only around 10%. “There was a massive black market, as you can see from all the international operators.”

There was also little to do to prepare before the technical specifications came out six months ahead of launch, even though Holland Casino had partnered Playtech for igaming as far back as 2014, Verkroost adds.

“Developers being developers, they like to see the specs before they launch anything,” he says. “Part of the specifications were released late 2020 and another part only followed in early 2021, so it took us until then to know what was allowed and what wasn’t, and what tests we would be subjected to before we could begin the work.”

These incumbents have also been unable to cross-promote with their retail customer bases. “This is a real disadvantage even for an incumbent like Holland Casino. We didn’t have a database we could reactivate, similar to the operators going through the cooling-off period. We had to start from scratch.”

NLO, even with its limited sportsbook offering, had a similar issue, launching separate apps for its lottery and betting products more than a year ago, to split retail and online.

Between the two, they make up 56.6% of the market. This could well change as a host of private operators’ licence applications are approved – at the time of writing Kindred Group has been cleared for launch.

Whether the first few months of activity have given the local operators a “head start” remains to be seen. “I think it depends on which brands,” Depoortere says. “If you look at two or three international operators that were illegally active for a number of years, they have built good brand recognition and strong player bases.

“With that in mind I think it is maybe levelling out, rather than giving us a head start.”

He isn’t convinced these brands will regain their pre-launch market share. “Some players will go back to their old habits, but it will never go back to the way the market share was divided previously.”

Advertising under threat

Their task will be made harder by stricter advertising regulations. It took six months for Minister for Legal Protection Frank Weerwind to commit to stricter advertising legislation.

This comes in reaction to a perceived boom in gambling advertising, with anti-gambling politicians putting pressure on the government to act. A decree prohibiting the use of role models in gambling advertising will be enforced from 1 July, while a wider ban on untargeted advertising comes into force at the start of 2023.

Whether there was in fact a gambling boom is up for debate. De Goeij is not convinced. He points to comments from KSA chair René Jansen suggesting 634,000 accounts were created in Q4 2021.

“This does not mean there are so many players [on legal sites] in the Netherlands,” Jansen said in March. “An unknown number of players have an account with several providers. So there are fewer than 634,000.”

Estimates of over one million online gamblers therefore seemed “exaggerated” Jansen said.

“So, there was no boom,” de Goeij says. “Having said that, the perception has been quite different, particularly in regards to advertising.

“We went from a situation where there was no advertising, to a lot of ads from 1 October; a 100% increase.”

Depoortere argues the illegal market made advertising crucial, if state-owned entities such as NLO are to fulfil their goal of leading players to regulated offerings.

“To do that, if you have a market that was 90% illegal previously, you need to advertise to show who has a licence and who does not,” he explains. “As a result, there was a massive amount of advertising for all the legal companies.”

Previously there was just one brand appearing on TV, NLO. “[Suddenly] there are nine more brands putting on their own promotion and competing for TV advertising. You will obviously notice that. That is a clear consequence of opening the market. Every company after putting in the effort to secure the licence has the right to advertise.”

Verkroost agrees with de Goeij, acknowledging that the industry has gone from “zero to 100 in two seconds”, but the public needs time to adjust, especially with the channelisation goal in mind.

“It’s been a shock for some people I’m sure but I think it’s the right thing to do,” he adds. “You don’t build a safe space and then not tell anyone about it.”

That’s not to say licensees, and the industry, haven’t taken action to roll back advertising. Holland Casino had cut advertising by 50% compared to launch volumes and has never offered bonuses to under-24s.

“Some of our competitors are not backing down,” Verkroost adds. “I can see it eating into our market share but it’s a cowboy world; we want to be the cowboy with a white hat, the guy you feel is on your side. The behaviour we’ve shown is consistent with that ambition.”

There has also been action at an industry level, which Depoortere says was due in part to TV companies not agreeing to a set number of commercials per advertising block.

“That’s why we took the initiative to set up the Reclamecode Online Kansspelen, and we are a member of [operator association] Vergunde Nederlandse Online Kansspelaanbieders (VNLOK),” he says. “Now there is no radio, no print, no outdoor advertising and we only advertise from 10pm onwards, rather than 9pm.”

The Reclamecode was developed by VNLOK and supported by NOGA, and de Goeij sees these self-regulatory measures as addressing problems with the Remote Gambling Act.

“The problem in the Netherlands is there are rules about the contents of the advertising, such as ‘restraint’. The total volume of advertising is not restricted by law,” he explains. “On one hand you ask the operator to compete, fight for market share and be responsible, and on the other hand you don’t want an aggregated volume that goes beyond a certain level.

“It’s almost naive to think that a market in which competition is ferocious, especially at opening, let the industry ensure that the total volume doesn’t get out of hand.”

This, he continues, could potentially limit the impact of the international brands as they finally secure licences, something he says could be a concern.

“It will be hard if you come into the market and don’t have the possibility of advertising at all, so hopefully we’re not going to end up in a situation where there is no advertising whatsoever.”

This seems unlikely in de Goeij’s view. It would constitute an unjustified restriction on freedom of expression. A ban would be “acting on fear and assumptions instead of facts and figures”.

And as the market approaches its first anniversary there is still plenty of scope for upheaval, with a wave of newcomers on the horizon. Depoortere estimates that as many as 30 operators could be angling for a licence.

That, in turn, could exacerbate the problems around advertising, testing the industry’s self-regulatory measures and the effectiveness of the government’s new measures.

Verkroost believes that only consistent, high standards will help the industry settle into a rhythm. “We’re trying to get to a place where online gaming is a normal part of society,” he says.

“Society [has to be] aware that there are risks, but they are being actively monitored and mitigated by us in order to provide a safe environment for everyone.” 

BlueBet to complete first phase of US growth strategy following FY growth

During the fourth and final quarter of the year, BlueBet signed a market access agreement with Caesars Entertainment, allowing it to conduct B2C online sportsbook operations in Indiana via its new ClutchBet brand announced earlier in the year.

BlueBet also has market access in Colorado, Iowa and Louisiana, and with the addition of Indiana to this roster, the operator said it can now complete the first stage of its two-stage “capital lite” US entry strategy with the ClutchBet brand.

The operator said there is significant opportunity for B2C expansion into other states, but its focus and capital will be directed towards the four initial states. It will also seek partners across the US for the launch of its white-label sportsbook-as-a-solution B2B (Saas) offer, in preparation for the second phase.

“BlueBet is ready to go-live in Iowa under the ClutchBet brand pending final approvals,” the operator said. “With platform testing successfully completed and final certification from GLI to shortly follow, the final step before receiving licence approval from the Iowa regulator is to complete geo-location testing. 

“Once complete, the company expects to have its licence approved in the coming weeks.”

The scheduled launches will follow a successful fourth quarter for BlueBet, during which its turnover – the amount wagered before winnings are paid out or losses incurred – increased 31.3% to $126.6m (£71.8m/€85.6m/US$87.7m).

Thoroughbred betting accounted for 47% of all wagers in Q4, with greyhound racing at 26%, harness racing 9% and other sports 18%. Players spent $68.3m betting via iPhones and $14.8m on Android devices, while $41.3m was spent on the BlueBet website and $2.3m through call centres.

In terms of gross revenue, this increased by 34.0% year-on-year from $12.7m to $17.0m, while the number of active customers increased by 64.2% to 53,328. 

The operator also noted net win for Q4 – the amount received from customers who placed losing bets, less the amount paid in placed winning bets and promotional costs – was 27.3% higher at $12.8m.

Looking at the full financial year, turnover was 48.5% higher at $511.9m, with gross revenue 59.5% up year-on-year to $70.5m. Net win for the year also increased by 53.6% to $54.6m.

IGT puts aside $150m for “probable loss” in DoubleDown lawsuit

The lottery and gaming technology supplier said that a $150m non-operating cost on its income statements represented “the probable loss associated with ongoing litigation and associated claims related to DoubleDown”.

Former customers of DoubleDown – a social casino business that was previously a subsidiary of IGT – launched a class action against the business, arguing that social casino games in which players can choose to purchase tokens that can be used for play were illegal gambling in Washington.

The case was first filed in 2017 – the year IGT sold DoubleDown – and has gone through a number of stages through various courts. However in its Q2 earnings, IGT acknowledged that a loss was more likely than not, and so included a $150m expense to cover the loss.

The DoubleDown case was one of a number of social gaming lawsuits in the state of Washington, with Big Fish games creating a $155m settlement fund in May 2020 to refund money lost playing its games last year.

Also in its Q2 results, IGT announced revenue of $1.02bn. While this was down by 1.9% year-on-year, IGT chief executive Vince Sadusky noted that it was still among the supplier’s best quarterly results ever.

“Strong customer and player demand for IGT’s products and solutions drove some of our strongest profit results ever in the second quarter and first half of the year,” said Vince Sadusky, CEO of IGT. “Our business profile is supported by significant recurring revenue streams backed by long-term contracts and resilient end markets, providing a solid foundation on which to grow. We are laser focused on executing our strategic objectives and creating compelling value for our stakeholders.”

Products made up $179m of this revenue total, up 27.8%, with services contributing the other $842m, down 6.5%.

Breaking revenue down by each of IGT’s three main business divisions, the global lottery business brought in $648m, which was 11.1% less than in Q2 of 2021. Revenue from the global gaming business, dealing with land-based casino products, increased by 20.6% to $330m.

IGT’s digital and betting division – which after the quarter ended was bolstered by the acquisition of iSoftBet – contributed $43m, up by $1m year-on-year.

IGT’s costs ticked slightly down, by 0.4% to $793m.

As a result, the business was left with operating income of $228m. The business also reported adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of $409m, down by 7.0%.

Earnings per share, however, were up to $0.57, after the business completed stock buybacks in November 2021, which reduced its number of shares.

After $205m of non-operating expenses – mostly due to the DoubleDown lawsuit but also including interest costs – the business was left with $34m in income from continuing operations.

During the quarter, IGT also continued to reduce its net debt, to $5.72bn, and said it expects this to be reduced further through upcoming divestments.

As a result, the business said it was “well-positioned to weather economic cycles with lower leverage and increased liquidity”.

New Singapore regulator takes over

The act expanded the mandate of the preceding organisation, the Casino Regulatory Authority of Singapore (CRA) beyond casinos to the entirety of the gambling landscape in the city state. As a consequence of this, the body renamed to reflect the change.

The regulator said the rationale behind this unification of gambling regulation was to increase its agility and the coherence of its oversight.

The government stated in a press release accompanying the launch of the organisation: “The GRA Act establishes the GRA as the single regulator for all forms of gambling in Singapore.”

“This allows the Government to more effectively stay ahead of technological and gambling trends, respond more adequately to emerging gambling products, and take a more holistic and coherent approach to gambling policies.”

Previous to the change, gambling in Singapore was regulated by a constellation of differing agencies, each with their own structures and staff. In a response to parliamentary questioning in March, Minister of State Desmond Tan summed up the situation:

“Gambling regulation is currently overseen by various Government agencies. For example, CRA regulates casinos; the Gambling Regulatory Unit in MHA today regulates online gambling services and fruit machines; and the Singapore Totalisator Board governs Singapore Pools’ physical gambling services,” he said.

Tan continued, pointing to the positive effects of consolidating gambling legislation and regulation.

“There will be synergies from consolidating gambling legislation and regulation. As the single regulator for all forms of gambling, GRA will be able to pool resources and expertise together to deal with the issue.”

 “The establishment of GRA will be resource neutral across the Government. Manpower will be transferred together with the transfer of function.”

“This will not lead to an excess of employees. In addition to overseeing existing regulatory regimes, GRA will also oversee new regulatory regimes, such as the new licensing regime for gambling in private establishments and class-licence regimes for low-risk gambling products.”

The establishment of the GRA was one of the keystones of the wider package of gambling reforms passed in March. Alongside the GRA act, which updated the purview of the regulator, the Singapore legislature also passed the Gambling Control act, which updated gambling law.

Scout shareholders to vote on 90% share dilution next month

Fantasy provider Scout announced that it would conduct a share issue in order to save the business in June, after it identified a SEK17m ($1.7m/£1.4m/€1.6m) commitment in its finances which it said it was previously unaware of.

The commitment will impact cash flow for third quarter of this year and have a negative effect on profit and loss in the quarter of around SEK5.5m.

As a result of the new cost, Scout leadership took drastic action to save the business, including laying off 68 employees, between its offices in Bergen in Norway and Lviv in Ukraine.

As well as the layoffs, Scout said it would issue 202.7 million new shares, diluting existing shares by 90%.

The board has now revealed more details of the share issue. Each shareholder will be offered the opportunity to buy nine more shares in the business, at SEK0.50 per share.

Scout said that the issue was fully guaranteed, as existing shareholders Topline Capital Partners LP, Scobie Ward, Novobis AB, Knutsson Holdings AB and Erlinghundra AB have pledged to subscribe for a combined SEK46m worth of shares and underwrite a further SEK55m worth of shares in the event other shareholders do not choose to buy.

The newly issued shares cannot be sold without Scout’s permission for nine months.

If enough smaller shareholders do not purchase, Topline Capital Partners’ underwriting commitments mean that its stake in the business could exceed 30%. This would typically trigger a mandatory offer to acquire a majority stake in the business. However, to avoid this, the business has agreed to divest enough shares to bring it under the threshold if required.

Because of share number maximums in Scout’s articles of association, the issue must be approved by shareholders. The vote for this approval will occur on 1 September.

GiG reveals Betsson as first Colombia sportsbook partner

In June, GiG said its Sportnco subsidiary had signed its first Colombia-facing sportsbook deal with an unnamed ‘tier-one’ operator.

GiG has now revealed it has been working with Betsson in Colombia for the past year, with the country the third regulated market in which GiG provides both software and services to this client.

The deal, GiG said, ratifies a partnership that was initiated more than 12 months ago when Betsson completed the takeover of regional operator Colbet.co in June 2021, shortly after which it agreed to migrate onto GiG’s Sportnco’s platform.

Betsson, which operates both online and via retail in Colombia, said that its presence in the country increased significantly over the past year as a result of using GAN’s player account manager.

“As part of our rebranding in Colombia, we migrated to GiG’s platform which we are using in some of our other markets,” Betsson’s commercial director for Southern Europe and LatAm Andrea Rossi said.

“We chose GiG as we believe that they are the best partners with whom we can keep growing in the market of Colombia. We know the platform, its capabilities, and we have a very good relationship with the team and this latest partnership solidifies that connection.”

Sportnco managing director Hervé Schlosser added: “We are delighted to formally announce the agreement with Betsson in Colombia, which underlines the strong geographical footprint we are establishing in LatAm. 

“Both the growing demand of our solutions and our reputation, particularly alongside tier-one operators Betsson, is a great source of pride for our group and we are full of expectation for the future.”

Tab NZ misses June revenue and turnover budgets

Wagering turnover for the month reached NZ$197.3m (£102.0m/€121.5m/US$124.2m), which was 3.9% or $8.1m below budget.

Net profit amounted to $11.0m, some $1.7m below a budget of $12.7m, with betting profit $1.5m under budget at $9.3m and gaming profit also $200,000 off budget at $1.7m.

However, Tab NZ did note that operating expenses for the month were $200,000 below an initial budget of $10.0m, amounting to $9.6m, while code distributions and other payments were $100,000 above budget at $13.2m.

Analysing its monthly performance, Tab NZ said the primary reason for it missing budgets was due to consumers not spending as much as initially anticipated amid the rising cost of living in New Zealand.

Retail and hospitality was able to operate without capacity restrictions despite the outbreak of the Omicron novel coronavirus (Covid-19) variant, but Tab NZ said this remained a factor during the month.

In addition, Tab NZ said there was a decrease in starter numbers and across the three racing codes through April, May and June, which in turn contributed to the variance in turnover.

The TAB Stradbroke Handicap (G1) was the most popular racing event in June, attracting $411,000 in wagers, whereas in sports, the clash between the Blues and Crusaders ranked first with $1.4m in turnover.

For financial year-to-date performance, net profit for the 11 months to the end of June was $141.1m, some $3.4m below budget, while distributions were $5.3m above budget at $161.2m.