Swedish government scraps plans for offshore crackdown

The Government revealed it would not go ahead with the plan when it submitted a new law on match-fixing and unlicensed gambling to the country’s Legal Council (Lagrådet).

The law followed on from a 2021 report from the Ministry of Finance and Chamber of Commerce director general Gunnar Larsson, also on the subject of match-fixing and unlicensed gambling.

Under the current system, regulator Spelinspektionen has authority over any gambling targeted at the Swedish market -such as through marketing or local payment options – and may take action against operators doing so without a licence.

However, the report recommended the scope of the act be changed to include all gambling available to Swedish players.

As a result, operators passively taking Swedish customers without holding a local licence may have been subject to regulatory action.

When the proposals were put forward for consultation, the government noted that the majority of respondents either approved of or were neutral to the approach. Regulator Spelinspektionen noted that a change would reduce the need for interpretation of what it means to target Sweden.

On the other hand, the state treasury said it was “not reasonable” to make the change, as it would force businesses that have no interaction with Sweden to take action to avoid taking Swedish customers. 

Meanwhile, the Administrative Court in Linköping argued that it was not clear if the Swedish government had the power to make such a change. The Public Prosecutor’s Office said the rules would be “very difficult to investigate and prosecute”.

The government, as a result, decided not to implement the change. It said that its reason was that “there was a risk that the focus would be on whether players are resident or permanently resident in Sweden, instead of on whether the games are adapted for the Swedish market”.

However, the government did say that “there are still strong reasons for allowing the current scope of application of the Gaming Act to be developed through practice before it may be relevant to consider an extension of the scope”.

While it did not go through with the plan to expand the scope of the Gambling Act, it did agree with a proposal to simplify the process for payment blocking. 

The consultation responses included one from the State Treasury, which noted that Spelinspektionen “has had difficulty using the provisions on payment blocking in the way intended by the legislature”. Similarly, Spelinspektionen said the new proposal would lead to “a simpler and more efficient process”.

Within the field of match-fixing, the government proposed allowing licensees to process personal data in order to check whether a sportsperson has participated in insider betting.

Similarly, sporting bodies should also be allowed to process this data for the same reasons.

The report had previously noted that in Sweden there is currently “no actor who has a clearly designated responsibility for to obtain, compile, analyse and disseminate information about suspected match-fixing”, and that information sharing has been harmed by certain data protection rules. This, it said, harmed efforts to fight match-fixing.

In addition, the government determined that a clearer definition of “match-fixing” was necessary. 

The new laws would be scheduled to enter into force on 1 July, 2023.

Danish gambling revenue hits year-high DKK609m in April

This was 15.1% higher than the gross gaming revenue (GGR) recorded in April 2021.

Sports betting amounted to DKK222m for the month, down by 16.5% year-on-year but up by 43.2% from March.

GGR from online casino came to DKK242m. This was an increase of 7% monthly, but a decrease from DKK256m from April 2021.

Slot machine revenue accounted for DKK110m of the total, which was steady month-on-month. However, this was up significantly from DKK7m recorded in April last year, a period that included land-based closures related to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Land based casino grew just slightly, by one million – from March DKK34m in March to DKK35m in April. There was no comparable figure from April 2021, again due to Covid-19.

Rhodes reveals Gambling Commission plans to “ramp up” enforcement

Rhodes made the remarks at the Westminster Media Forum Regulation Conference, where he spoke on the current state of the landscape in the industry ahead of the release of the Gambling Act review white paper. Rhodes hinted that the contents of the white paper should not necessarily be a surprise to anyone paying attention to the GC’s public comments.  

“On behalf of the Gambling Commission, without waiting for what the white paper may bring, I can give you an overview on what we think needs to happen to make gambling in Great Britain as fair and safe as it can be, and what our next steps are to achieving that,” said Rhodes.

However, the regulator also said again that the regulator will not wait for the review to change how it takes action.

Rhodes adopted a strong tone on the subject of operators breaking standards: “Despite the successes that can come from this approach, we will not be complacent and will clearly set out the standards we expect. We will escalate the penalties for failings if we don’t see the industry start to consistently live up to our standards.”

“We intend to ramp up our enforcement work and the penalties that come with it,” he continued.

With this stark warning in mind, Rhodes argued that it was not just the public that suffered from shoddy standards, but the operators themselves: “Operators who aren’t compliant are not just letting their customers down or their own businesses. They are letting down the entire sector. Which should be frustrating for operators as much as it is for us.”

“Because we do also see good practice and improvements being adopted by some operators. But that will be for nothing if those operators who are making the changes we expect and demand continue to be drowned out by poor practice elsewhere.”

Rhodes also spoke to the global implications of GB gambling regulation. “Gambling is increasingly a global industry. Many gambling operators more closely resemble global tech firms than they do traditional bookmakers of yesteryear. And the British market is the largest regulated online market in the world.”

A prominent theme in Rhodes speech was the ambiguity of the best currently available data, as well as recent attempts to adopt better methodology. This comes after the Commission adopted a new survey methodology following a pilot scheme, despite this survey over-sampling gamblers.

“The same statistics we published that give a participation rate of 43% also say that just 0.2% of the population are currently termed problem gamblers,” said Rhodes. “That figure has come down over the last few years which is of course a good sign. But it is one we have only cautiously welcomed.”

“While our telephone survey is our official statistic we also look to the Health Survey data for England, Scotland and Wales for problem gambling data and the last set of combined survey results conducted in 2018 suggested 0.7% of the population were problem gamblers,” he continued.

Rhodes said it was the desire to acquire better quality, more frequent data that led the Commission to launch a participation and prevalence methodology pilot in 2021. While Rhodes spoke to how the initial results seem promising, the pilot won’t move onto to official statistics collection until 2023 – meaning it could be years until the survey is complete.

Better data, Rhodes continued, is needed for both the Commission and operators to make better decisions – especially in the current context where many people are already falling through the cracks.

“In our casework recently, we saw one example where a customer lost £60,000 in just two weeks and it was only then that the operator intervened. We found that no checks had been conducted prior to this point to assure the operator that the funds were legitimate, or event that the customer could afford it.”

“And a case where a customer lost £98,000 in five months without the necessary evidence being gathered to show this level of gambling was affordable to the customer,” added Rhodes.

Rhodes also pointed to some successes in the last few years: the 2019 industry challenges “led to better standards on VIPs, use of ad-tech online and games design,” as he described it. He further noted that the “ongoing work to develop a single customer view, between operators, ourselves and the ICO has the potential to reduce gambling harms without risking customer data.”

Despite these successes, Rhodes pushed against any tendency of waiting until the publication of the white paper before committing to action.

“No one in the gambling sector should believe that the Gambling Commission will accept waiting for the White Paper as an excuse not to tackle problems now. We don’t accept that, we don’t accept that anything should come before making sure you are trading as fair and as safe as possible. All the rest should be secondary.”

DraftKings and BetBlocker announce responsible gambling collaboration

The software allows consumers to set restrictions on their gambling activities across their devices for thousands of gaming sites across all regions, regardless on whether the sites themselves are regulated or the operators licensed.

“BetBlocker’s contributions to safer play are commendable and DraftKings is pleased to team up with this enterprising and disruptive not-for-profit that is advancing responsible gaming in a comprehensive and consumer friendly way,” said Chrissy Thurmond, DraftKings’ senior director of responsible gaming.

“We share BetBlocker’s vision that technology and innovation are critical to promoting safer play, and we extend a warm welcome to BetBlocker as they build their footprint in North America, following widespread success across the pond.”

According to BetBlocker, the free tool does not harvest personal data and allows users to download the software anonymously. Consumers can choose how long or in what capacity the restrictions last for; including a range of lengths stretching from days to years, as well as calendar blocking functionalities.  

“BetBlocker is thrilled to have the support of sports betting and gaming industry giant, DraftKings, to extend our software outside of the UK and Europe, to players in the United States and Canada,” said Pedro Romero, BetBlocker chief of safer gambling partnerships.”

“We’ve been impressed with DraftKings’ leadership in responsible gaming and we are grateful for their collaboration and financial support as we look to expand awareness of safer play technology.

“We encourage other operators to follow DraftKings’ example of going above and beyond what is required region by region, to ensure all players have the knowledge and tools to bet responsibly.”

DraftKings offers financial support to the US state councils and affiliates of the national council on problem Gambling through its state council funding programme. In May, the business launched its sports betting and igaming services in Ontario.

Disco Dawgs by Light & Wonder

Dax Wild symbols will have a multiplier of 3x or 4x applied, depending on the number of triggering Bonus symbols. Pug Wild symbols will land on the reels and remain active for 5 spins. The Pomeranian Wild symbols will have a multiplier of 2x or 3x on them.

Download the First Look Games affiliate pack for Disco Dawgs here!

Go Live Date (expected):20/06/2022Game special features:– Wild symbolsNumber of paylines:20Number of reels:5RTP% (recorded/theoretical):94-96%Variance/volatility:Medium-HighNumber of symbols to trigger feature/bonus?:3Can feature be retriggered?:NoNumber of free spins awarded?:8Stacked or expanding wilds in normal play?:Single WildStacked or expanding wilds in feature play?:Single WildNumber of jackpot tiers?:0Auto-play function?:Yes

ASA warns that its rules apply to “vast majority” of content marketing

The ASA said that “there have been questions raised by research” over whether ASA rules apply to social media “content marketing” from gambling operators. This content, the ASA said, “does not explicitly promote a brand but is intended to stimulate interest in its products or services”.

This, the regulator noted, posed a challenge as the ASA does regulate advertising but does not have power over editorial content.

“Gambling social media accounts sometimes include editorial-style content, like commentary or opinions on recent events, or more abstract humour, such as ‘memes’ and other irreverent takes on current sporting news,” the ASA said. “This has been described by researchers as ‘content marketing’ where there are no direct product references, calls to action or links to operator websites.”

The ASA, though, noted that “the vast majority” of content marketing is intended to sell a product or service, and so is under its remit.

However, it added that “there is a potential[…] for some social media content to fall outside the ASA’s enforcement remit on the basis that it is considered not to be directly connected with the supply of the gambling product”.

“This is likely to be where there are no direct, or significant indirect references, to gambling products,” it added.

For messages that are under its remit, the ASA noted that the rules for gambling ads still apply to these communications. These include that gambling ads should not be directed at under-18s, nor should they feature people who are under-25 in significant roles, cannot promote irresponsible play and must not be of “particular appeal” to children or young people.
The last of those rules is set to change, to a higher standard of “strong appeal”, which would prohibit the use of figures popular to children even if they are more popular among adults.

The ASA said it will ultimately continue to “consider complaints about social media ads brought to its attention on a case-by-case basis”.

“In the limited scenarios where complaints about operators’ social media are deemed not to be within remit, the ASA will refer them to the Gambling Commission,” the ASA added.

Swedish party calls for bigger bonuses and Svenska Spel break-up

The party submitted a parliamentary motion in response to the government’s own gambling reform bill submitted earlier this year.

Industry association BOS said considering the Moderates are currently the largest opposition party, the motion may reveal “what the party itself wants to do with the gambling policy in the event of a change of power”.

The party said that it supported regulated gambling, but admitted “not everything went exactly right” when the Swedish market opened for business in January 2019.

As a result, the Moderates welcomed many of the proposals that the government had brought forward, including the licensing requirement for B2B software providers designed to reduce illegal gambling. However, the party added that it wanted “to go further than the government” in protecting the licensed market.

One piece of action that it said was necessary was a review of the government’s ability to change the rules for operators via regulation – which would not need to be voted on in the Riksdag – rather than legislation. These rules included a SEK5,000 (£403/€471/$492) monthly deposit cap for online casino, which was the source of major opposition from the sector.

“A market such as gaming needs long-term conditions and clear rules of the game rather than quick throws of the dice,” the party said. “Therefore, the government’s regulatory possibilities should be reviewed.”

One specific area where the Moderate Party called for a further review was bonuses. Currently, these bonuses may only be issued to customers once upon sign-up. The party noted that the government’s reform bill proposed making an exception for charitable lotteries, and said instead the rules should be loosened for all.

“This would make it easier for gaming companies to retain customers in the licensed market and have long-term relationships with the players, both of which increase consumer protection,” the party said.

In addition, the Moderates called for state-owned lottery operator Svenska Spel to be split into a lottery business, and one that offers licensed games such as sports betting and online casino gaming. The business operating in the licensed space, it said, should then be sold to the private sector.

Gustaf Hoffstedt, secretary general of BOS, focused on this aspect of the motion, and noted that as the Swedish Democrats have also backed a break-up of Svenska Spel and the privatisation of its licensed offering. As a result, the country’s two main opposition parties have now both called for the policy.

“I welcome the fact that the two largest parties in opposition now have been so clear about their intention to privatise the competitive part of state operator Svenska Spel, if they will form or support a new government after September’s general elections,” he said. “To run a commercial gambling business is not appropriate for a state.

“A state shall set rules for commercial gambling companies and make sure the companies comply with these rules, rather than being an active player on the market itself.”

Looking at a specific proposal in the government bill, meanwhile, the Moderates rejected the idea of bringing in a requirement for “adjusted moderation” in all gambling marketing activity. The party said it was “too soon” to make changes in this area, and that tightening marketing rules “risks eroding” the regulated market.

Finally, the party proposed that the government should implement reforms proposed in a report published last year by Gunnar Larsson, director general of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce, alongside the Ministry of Finance.

This report made a number of recommendations to limit match-fixing and unlicensed play, the most significant being a change in approach to offshore operators.

Rather than considering the Gambling Act to only cover gambling directed at Swedish players, the report suggested that all gambling available to Swedes fall under its remit. This would therefore mean that operators without local licences would be effectively forced to block Swedish customers.

Oregon sports betting revenue continues upward trend in May

The monthly total was comfortably higher than $2.4m in May last year and also up by some 31.6% from $3.8m in April this year.

Player spending was also up 50.5% year-on-year from $27.7m to $41.7m, though this was slightly down from $42.9m in April 2022.

DraftKings, which has a state-wide partnership with the Oregon Lottery, generated $5.0m in revenue from a $41.7m in player bets in April.

In contrast, the Oregon Lottery’s Scoreboard online sportsbook – which has been phased out to be replaced by DraftKings but still pays out on bets placed before this phaseout – took $33,440 in wagers and paid out $35,729.

Basketball remained the most popular sport among players, drawing $18.2m in wagers with DraftKings and a further$24,388 from Scoreboard, generating $2.6m in revenue in the process.

Baseball followed with $10.1m in wagers and $1.2m in revenue, all of which came through DraftKings, then soccer with $3.3m in bets in DraftKings and $6,813 from Scoreboard, with revenue at $326,778.

As to the type of bets players were placing in April, $30.8m of wagers placed with DraftKings were singles and teasers, while the remaining $10.9m being parlay bets.

This was similar on Scoreboard, with $31,363 worth of single and teaser bets placed during the month, and a further while just $2,077 in parlay bets.

GiG’s Martin Collins on local heroes in US sports betting

Across Europe there are multiple examples of ‘local heroes’, brands that use their home advantage to carve out a strong local position. The likes of Winamax in France, Snai or Sisal in Italy and Betcity in the Netherlands, even if they have expanded beyond their borders, are inextricably liked to their home markets. 

This has yet to hit the US to date, though the reasons behind it are fairly obvious. The costs of doing business state by state, coupled with a limited number of licences on offer, means the brands with the deepest pockets and the biggest advertising budgets have swallowed all available space. 

However regulatory frameworks are evolving to create space for newcomers that can act as disruptors on a local scale. Maryland, for example, has developed a more expansive model in which in-person wagering will be open to 10 casinos, sports stadiums and racetracks, with a further 30 available to other physical businesses in the state. 

These licence holders will then be eligible for a mobile betting licence, with legislation allowing up to 60 to be issued.

This creates one of the most expansive state markets in the US to date, and opens it up to a vast number of new competitors. One of these preparing to compete is Crab Sports, a business established in 2021, which this week finalised a head of terms agreement with Gaming Innovation Group (GiG). 

Hyper-local focus

The general playbook for new entrants to the US is look for a foothold in one state, then use it as a springboard to move into others. For Crab Sports – named after one of the state’s most popular dishes, no less – Maryland will be the sole focus. 

The agreement marks GiG’s first US-facing sportsbook deal since its acquisition of Sportnco, something that director of sales and business development Martin Collins sees as “a game-changer” for the supplier. 

Martin Collins, Gaming Innovation Group

“The number of opportunities we’ve got has increased massively – previously we didn’t have the competitive sportsbook product to tackle these,” he says. 

That doesn’t mean striking the head of terms agreement was an easy process. “It was really rigorous, similar to a tier one deal,” Collins explains. “They were keen to be sure they picked the right platform to fulfil their goals.” 

It’s also the product of ongoing conversations across the industry, especially with the investment community. This ongoing dialogue helps GiG identify opportunities to move quickly and get introductions or referrals to prospective clients. 

“It’s an important source of leads,” he adds. “We expect a third of our leads to come from inbound queries, through marketing; a third from outbound, through the sales team and a third through referrals. For us that’s the perfect ratio. If you nail that, you get a lot of good opportunities.”

Through this approach, GiG is targeting three types of partners in the US. Similar to Europe, it is seeking tier one operators looking to expand stateside, where it can use its regulated market know-how to help them move quickly and efficiently. 

The tribal market follows, for whom the safer gambling features built into its platform allows partners to expand sustainably, mindful of the community-led approach taken in Indian Country. 

Crab Sports fits into the third category, of challenger brands, where the target is one state, and one state only. 

That hyper-local focus, Collins explains, can be particularly powerful. Crab Sports is not going to have the vast resources of the heavily backed national operators. “But they do have the local know-how and the partnerships to bring customers to the brand,” Collins says. 

Building brand equity

He believes local challengers such as Crab Sports will not find space in every state, pointing out that the likes of New York, though its tender process, 51% tax rate and $25m licence fee, mean there is simply no route in. 

“You have states that have defined, local identities such as Maryland, Ohio or Louisiana, where there is an opportunity for these challengers to come in,” he continues. “Simply because they can create partnerships with local businesses in the market, and get direct access to players by allowing these [outlets] to generate revenue through sports betting and igaming at a later stage.”

Those partnerships may not see a business like Crab Sports dominate the airwaves in Maryland. But by leveraging that local presence, whether that is through sports teams, entertainment venues, or bars and restaurants, it positions the business as part of the community. 

This, Collins says, has been built into the agreement. “We believe that spending heavily is unsustainable so we’re encouraging customers like Crab Sports to take advantage of the pillars of the platform. There’s GiG Data and GiG Logic, but the other key element is the CMS; that allows us to segment the customer journey, to develop personalised journeys for each user.

“They might be acquired through a bar acting as an affiliate, or from a campaign run with a local team such as the Baltimore Ravens. They can take this information to develop a highly personalised campaign, which creates that affinity with the brand.”

A tool such as Logic, he adds, adds a layer of automation that makes customer management significantly less intensive, in terms of resource and spending. For an up-and-coming brand, that significantly benefits their bottom line. 

But these campaigns, he stresses, should not be centred around incentivising customer with cold, hard cash. Even a meal at a local restaurant could be an effective way of engaging a player, and developing loyalty.

Challengers don’t have the same resources available to the major players in US sports betting, so they have to be more strategic about how they invest marketing Dollars. But even with that vast marketing investment, it remains to be seen whether the promotional spend is actually generating decent returns. 

“The major players haven’t done this in other states,” Collins continues. “They’ve been acquiring players through bonuses, then retaining them with continued bonusing, and as a consequence lifetime value is low, and cost per acquisition is high.

“I’ve been in the industry for 16 years now, and every company has traditionally spent heavily on acquisition, but not put the same investment into developing loyalty. When you do that in a highly regulated, highly taxed market, it kills any chance of posting a profit.”

The ‘spray and pray’ approach, after all, is increasingly being questioned. Caesars Digital has pledged to reduce marketing spend. Churchill Downs is already powering down its betting and igaming operations. Rumours persist about WynnBet being sold or shuttered. 

“They’re now trying to be cleverer, push their loyalty schemes, and build customers relationships on the basis of loyalty, rather than money,” Collins says. |But they acquired them through bonusing – that doesn’t create any brand loyalty. 

This, in turn, creates room for a new breed of operators such as Crab Sports to find a way in, even on a single-state basis. 

“These smaller brands, the tribes, can drive something unique, even if they see the big brands on their TV every day,” Collins adds. “Over time I think we will see that come to fruition.”